Heineken’s third-quarter trading update shows volume growth returning, premium brands advancing faster than the overall portfolio, and revenue per hectolitre rising only modestly. The three are moving in different directions, complicating the picture behind the volume recovery.
Total volume rose 4.8% organically in the quarter, with consolidated volume up 3.9%. Net revenue (beia) increased 4.6%. Net revenue per hectolitre grew just 0.7%, while price-mix on a constant geographic basis rose 1.8%. Premium volume grew 11.5%, well ahead of the total portfolio. Global brands rose 9.9%, with Heineken up 9.7%. Mainstream volume increased 2.4%. The company gained or held share in more than two-thirds of its markets.
A year earlier the picture was different. In the third quarter of 2025, consolidated volume declined 3.8% organically and beer volume fell 4.3%, with net revenue (beia) down 0.3%. The return to volume growth in 2026 is therefore clear. What remains limited is the pace at which that volume has translated into higher revenue per hectolitre.
Asia Pacific supplied much of the volume recovery. The region delivered particularly strong momentum in Vietnam, China and India. Volume gains in these markets do not automatically generate the same revenue per hectolitre as gains in more mature markets. Stronger growth in lower-priced geographies can therefore support headline volume while restraining the pace of unit revenue improvement, even as brand mix within those markets improves. This is a question of where growth occurs and under what conditions. It does not require a claim that the global industry’s growth centre has shifted permanently.
Subscribe to our newsletter
The distinction between product mix and geographic mix matters here. Premiumisation describes how the portfolio itself is shifting toward higher-value brands. Geographic mix describes where the volume is coming from. The first can improve while the second still limits the group’s overall revenue per hectolitre. Faster premium growth is real, yet it does not by itself determine the economic result at group level when a large share of the incremental volume arrives from markets with lower average revenue per hectolitre.
Premiumisation continues. The outperformance of premium volume and global brands, alongside modest mainstream growth, indicates that gains are not confined to a single price tier. Low- and no-alcohol products grew in the double digits, led by Heineken 0.0 and Heineken Ultimate. Beyond beer volume rose in the mid-teens, supported by Desperados innovations. Together, these categories suggest a broader growth strategy, extending beyond trading consumers up within traditional beer. Premium growth remains a relative strength, yet it has not been sufficient on its own to produce a stronger lift in group-level unit revenue.
Rafa Oliveira, in his first quarterly update as CEO, noted good volume growth across regions and strong delivery from global brands and priority segments. He also stated that the company has strong foundations but is not translating them into consistent growth and winning with consumers and customers as often as it should. The distinction matters: a return to volume growth is a clear improvement, but Heineken’s own assessment suggests that consistent execution remains unfinished business.
Heineken has reaffirmed guidance for 2% to 6% organic operating profit growth in 2026. The volume recovery is real, and premium brands remain a source of strength. But the quarter also shows why volume alone is an incomplete measure of progress: where growth comes from, and how effectively it translates into revenue, still matter.
